We would not ever if we were in our right minds sign up to proctor for a four hour stretch at an art show. However, through a series of misadventures this became our assignment last night. It had the virtue of getting done in one trip what would have been two two-hour commitments. With little enthusiasm, I headed out with my son, to spend what was pretty certain to be a slow, rainy evening at the local library. So, what did we learn from this adventure in tedium?
Amazingly, quite a lot. We were told even before we had a chance to see the little red sticker now covering the price, that one of John's photographs had been sold. I had checked about one week into the exhibit, hoping to come home with good news for John. At that time only three works had been purchased, and none of them John's. What a difference another week had made. Little red stickers now peppered the room and I would guess 15 or 20 works have now found new homes.
Four hours also offered me the chance to reflect on two things; viewing distance and lighting. I realized I do what everyone who visited the show did. I stand parallel to the wall, quite close to the works and inch my way along. It is probably the only time I am ever going to see works in this way. If I buy one and take it home, unless I hang it in a hallway, it is more apt to be viewed hanging over a piece of furniture or seen more peripherally as I walk through an area. Also, seeing one of John's work hanging above eye level and two below changed the viewing experience. Sitting at the back of the room at the proctor's desk, I decided many of the works benefited from taking a longer view.
What I would never have expected and really the item the artist had even less control over than the hanging of the exhibit, was the difference the lighting in the room made over the course of the evening. This was a surprise since the room has only minimal light from outside; several rows of opaque glass bricks at ceiling height on one wall. The rest of the room is well lit by track lighting. Yet there were three large paintings on the back wall, the most expensive items in the show ranging in price from $900 to $2500, that changed very perceptibly as the evening progressed.
To not put too delicate a point on it, I had returned to the show the second time to see what had been sold and also to take another look at these very paintings. I didn't get it. They looked amateurish and the price seemed more ego than reality induced. Then about 8:00 pm last night, it started to pour outside, something in the quality of the light changed and as I turned around it was as if I had never seen these painting before. I could see what the artists had been trying to achieve and until that moment, I thought, had eluded them. There may have still been a bit of ego in the price for a small town show, but there was also a lot more value than had been apparent.
The last observation I will share is this; group shows, mounted by local artists with varying levels of expertise, offer the art lover a wonderful opportunity purchase very nice works at affordable prices. My personal opinion is that before I would spend in the $1,000 and up category I would want to think twice. However, most of the works were priced between $50 and $150. and if ego might have inflated some prices there were, I would hazard, more prices that were affixed very cautiously and with more love of having the opportunity to exhibit than any thought of personal gain. There is also a special joy in supporting art in your community and in knowing the artist.
Recent Comments